 |
|
| | |
| Author | Message |
|---|
SpaceBar Addict

Name: Patrick Age: 23 Location: Quincy, MA Joined: 2007-04-08 Post Count: 1199 Contribution: 965 Integrity: 0
 | Subject: Cams & Rockers Fri May 11, 2007 8:31 pm | |
| I'm looking to know a little more about the Cams and rockers. What are the differences between them in reliability and performance? I'm not looking to get too big into modding just get a little quicker (high 13s) as this is my daily driver. I've read that a mild cam is greater on the performance side but doesn't hurt realiability either. What do you guys think about it? Has anyone here cammed their engine? _________________
Performance - S1X Cam, 105# Springs, Intense 3.3 MPS, FWI, SLP headers, SLP HF cat, Flowmaster 40 Series, Res Delete, 180* T stat, Autolite 104s, Custom PCM Tune
Electronics - 2006 Kicker S12l7, KX1200.1 Amp, Pioneer 6x9s, Pioneer DEH-7700MP HU, Viper 791XV Alarm, Aeroforce scan guage
Apperance - SilverStar ULTRA, Custom Chrome Grill, Woodgrain Dash Kit & Steering wheel, 18" Daat-59 Rims, Toyo Proxes4 tires
PB 14.93 @ 95.39 2.32 60' ..before the cam
|
|  | | dreww Enthusiast

Location: Dallas Joined: 2007-04-10 Post Count: 765 Contribution: 1131 Integrity: 8
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Fri May 11, 2007 11:10 pm | |
| for high 13's I'd say rockers. if you do a cam, I say do it right. Alot of lift and probably new heads. But thats just me. |
|  | | urbsnspices Member

Location: CHICAGO, US of MFn America Joined: 2007-02-08 Post Count: 328 Contribution: 1251 Integrity: 1
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Sat May 12, 2007 5:57 am | |
| Dont forget the install on the cam, even done right, with all the precautions, $h!† can go wrong. I had a big cam installed. I paid a very competent guy to help me do it. 2k later the engine had big problems. Was it the heads, the cam install, or a pre-existing problem, who really knows. Engine = toast. I would go rockers if I were you. _________________ " It will take him a moment to realize that he is about to make 180 degree turn at speed... but you will be ready for it, braced for the G's and the fast heel toe work" - Raoul Duke
|
|  | | AA Administrator

Name: Aaron Age: 32 Location: C-bus, Ohio Joined: 2007-01-14 Post Count: 9474 Contribution: 3477 Integrity: 39
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Sat May 12, 2007 9:48 am | |
| It's a hard choice. To begin with, a cam is cheaper to buy than a set of rockers, plus the 1.9s require changing out springs/rods, which adds to cost. I think you can keep stock valve train intact using a mild cam. On the other hand, a cam install is more work than rockers, requires more tech know-how & mechanical skill. Easier to do if you drop the engine. Not everyone knows how or feels comfortable doing that kind of thing. Power increase is different. Rockers gain up high (4k rpm+), while a cam gives a solid power increase throughout the entire band. Some feel having more power mid-band is desirable, some think a boost up top helps offset our low-rpm torque curve. Because rockers only work higher up, they don't affect low rpm operation, idle, or general fuel economy. Cams do alter how your engine runs at all rpms. Tuning is necessary with some cams to get everything right. See: http://rivperformance.editboard.com/Supercharged-3800-Tech-c2/Series-II-Engine-Transmission-f4/30-SC-Pulley-t749.htm?_________________  |
|  | | dreww Enthusiast

Location: Dallas Joined: 2007-04-10 Post Count: 765 Contribution: 1131 Integrity: 8
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Sun May 13, 2007 9:38 am | |
|
the mildest cam intense had that I saw, made more lift than the 1.9 rockers. And it was VERY close to the stock limit of the stock head. You would still need to change out the springs to take advantage of that cam. just like we did to take advantage of our 1.9's. |
|  | | AA Administrator

Name: Aaron Age: 32 Location: C-bus, Ohio Joined: 2007-01-14 Post Count: 9474 Contribution: 3477 Integrity: 39
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:39 am | |
| ^^^ Good point. further supporting the idea that cams are more complex/expensive than rockers in the end. If you want the most performance possible, spending a little more time & money on a cam is the way to go. If you're okay seeing slightly smaller gains with less hassle, rockers are a good idea. _________________  |
|  | | Jason Enthusiast

Name: Jason Age: 26 Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada Joined: 2007-01-23 Post Count: 941 Contribution: 1795 Integrity: 12
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:18 am | |
| I would go with rockers. I went with a VS cam (the mildest one ZZP sells) and kept the stock valvetrain. Like you, I didn't an all out race-car, only a nice improvement. Although I have not yet modified the exhaust and the PCM, I feel the increase in power was not a good bang-for-the buck. I have to say I did not get the "cam install kit" from ZZP, which would have saved me at least 150$. I'm not saying the cam didn't yield impressive gains, just that I don't feel it was worth all the hassle. |
|  | | AA Administrator

Name: Aaron Age: 32 Location: C-bus, Ohio Joined: 2007-01-14 Post Count: 9474 Contribution: 3477 Integrity: 39
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:49 pm | |
| Another good point, Jason. The mildest cam (VS) may give similar gains to the most extreme rocker ratio (1.9:1). So, if you decide to go through the trouble of a cam, it makes sense to choose a more extreme grind. On the other hand, you'll probably see more value in even a mild cam after you open the exhaust a little more. _________________  |
|  | | Jason Enthusiast

Name: Jason Age: 26 Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada Joined: 2007-01-23 Post Count: 941 Contribution: 1795 Integrity: 12
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:56 pm | |
| |
|  | | dreww Enthusiast

Location: Dallas Joined: 2007-04-10 Post Count: 765 Contribution: 1131 Integrity: 8
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:17 pm | |
| | AA wrote: |
On the other hand, you'll probably see more value in even a mild cam after you open the exhaust a little more. |
and upgrade the PCM _________________ '96 Riviera - 4T60E - DHP tuned Exhaust: SLP headers, cat/EGR delete Intake: CAI, 2.76" MPS, N*, ported sc, 42.5lb w/ PRJ fuel rails, S2 IC, Meziere IC pump, machined LIM, frozenboost IC radiator Drivetrain: 1.9 roller rockers/pushrods, 105 valvesprings, AC delete next: 2003 4T80E with 50K to go in
|
|  | | palermocorey90 Addict

Name: Corey Age: 19 Location: Rome NY Joined: 2007-10-03 Post Count: 2950 Contribution: 1420 Integrity: -21
 | Subject: WHICH CAM? Mon May 12, 2008 6:28 pm | |
| im looking for the best cam to use with stock heads, and make decent power.but also have the beastly sound. im looking for used but if i need to use my saving bonds to buy new i will, i dont want to but i will. i know dave has the XP cam, and its very nice. what cam would you recommend _________________ | Quote: | holmboytravis 8:47pm:pics of Gen Five? holmboytravis 8:47pm:i'd stick the snout IMB |
I told you he was gay 2008 Pontiac Grand Prix: Daily Driver Palermo Edition
Last edited by palermocorey90 on Mon May 12, 2008 7:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|  | | Jason Enthusiast

Name: Jason Age: 26 Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada Joined: 2007-01-23 Post Count: 941 Contribution: 1795 Integrity: 12
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Mon May 12, 2008 7:10 pm | |
| I guess it depends on your goals. I'm quite satisfied with the VS, as are many people. The xp will kill it on the top end, but for my purely street use, it is fine. the last criteria I would use to select a cam would be sound. If you want it to lope, change your exhaust and lower the idle speed a bit. |
|  | | palermocorey90 Addict

Name: Corey Age: 19 Location: Rome NY Joined: 2007-10-03 Post Count: 2950 Contribution: 1420 Integrity: -21
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Mon May 12, 2008 7:20 pm | |
| i want street for most but some strip time maybe, and thats is a HUGE MAYBE. would roller rockers be a better idea for now or what. i dont want to spend the money but to get some extra power i need too. my goal is 300 HP at the crank, well for now _________________ | Quote: | holmboytravis 8:47pm:pics of Gen Five? holmboytravis 8:47pm:i'd stick the snout IMB |
I told you he was gay 2008 Pontiac Grand Prix: Daily Driver Palermo Edition |
|  | | TonySmooth89 Addict

Name: Anthony Age: 20 Location: Florida Joined: 2007-11-15 Post Count: 2342 Contribution: 1471 Integrity: 8
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Mon May 12, 2008 9:59 pm | |
| IF 300hp at the crank is your goal , than i'd suggest rockers ,as with rockers , ported blower , tb , and headers/exhaust i'd imagine you could be at around 300-320 or so hp at the crank. And you could always add an intercooler later on for more power ,or sell the rockers to me when you do decide you want a cam. _________________ 1996 Riviera, 89k miles Show: Tint ,Sherwood dash kit , PAU 17s , Magnaflow tips Go: 1.9s ,FWI , 99+, Stage 1 TB, Plog + DP , 3.4" , Ported Gen III , decent tune. Handlng: STB , Ma822s. STS 22mm rear sway bar. Up next : KYB GR-2s ,
|
|  | | dreww Enthusiast

Location: Dallas Joined: 2007-04-10 Post Count: 765 Contribution: 1131 Integrity: 8
 | Subject: Re: Cams & Rockers Mon May 12, 2008 10:33 pm | |
| | TonySmooth89 wrote: | | IF 300hp at the crank is your goal , than i'd suggest rockers ,as with rockers , ported blower , tb , and headers/exhaust i'd imagine you could be at around 300-320 or so hp at the crank. And you could always add an intercooler later on for more power ,or sell the rockers to me when you do decide you want a cam. |
agreed, 300hp crank isnt that hard. AA pretty much did it with only rockers, headers and 3.4" _________________ '96 Riviera - 4T60E - DHP tuned Exhaust: SLP headers, cat/EGR delete Intake: CAI, 2.76" MPS, N*, ported sc, 42.5lb w/ PRJ fuel rails, S2 IC, Meziere IC pump, machined LIM, frozenboost IC radiator Drivetrain: 1.9 roller rockers/pushrods, 105 valvesprings, AC delete next: 2003 4T80E with 50K to go in
|
|  | | |
| Page 1 of 6 | Goto page : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  |
| | Permissions of this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |
|