| First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Bowersk Enthusiast
Name : Bowers Age : 44 Location : Okawville, Il Joined : 2011-01-19 Post Count : 219 Merit : 7
| Subject: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:26 pm | |
| Ok i've seen this here somewhere before but cant find it after searching for 30 minutes. What's the equation to convert Map kPa and Barometric pressure kPa into boost PSI? First logged WOT run on the new motor. Have some weird numbers with my LTFT and STFT but I just reset them earlier today. I was just curious as to Boost PSI. High end of the run: Map kPa = 126 Barometric Pressure kPa = 102 So from what I've seen posted on other sites 126 - 102 = 24 x .49 = 11.76 PSI ?
Last edited by Bowersk on Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:04 am; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
deekster_caddy Master
Name : Derek Age : 52 Location : Reading, MA Joined : 2007-01-31 Post Count : 7717 Merit : 109
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:50 pm | |
| IIRC MAP KPa 0-100 is negative vacuum, 100-200 is positive, 200 is ~1 atmosphere or 14.7?something PSI.
Baro is atmospheric, should always be almost 100, a reference point. If MAP = Baro you are at 0 PSI, WOT in an N/A car or just about to enter boost in a SC car.
0 MAP = -14.7 PSI (vacuum), 100 MAP = 0 PSI, 200 MAP = 14.7 PSI (boost)
If I'm way off feel free to correct me but I think that's it. | |
|
| |
Bowersk Enthusiast
Name : Bowers Age : 44 Location : Okawville, Il Joined : 2011-01-19 Post Count : 219 Merit : 7
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:53 pm | |
| That's exactly what I've seen around on the different sites. | |
|
| |
deekster_caddy Master
Name : Derek Age : 52 Location : Reading, MA Joined : 2007-01-31 Post Count : 7717 Merit : 109
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:54 pm | |
| So the formula must be (14.7/100) ~ 14.7/(MAP-100) to get vacuum?
edit no I don't think this is right, but it's something like this. | |
|
| |
Bowersk Enthusiast
Name : Bowers Age : 44 Location : Okawville, Il Joined : 2011-01-19 Post Count : 219 Merit : 7
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:00 pm | |
| This is going to drive me nuts. I know it was more simple than this. I have a whole yellow notepad page full of Texan math...its not looking good.
Also, trying to eliminate a fuel smell, going to get another screenshot at idle. LTFT sticks at 16.4 and STFT stays at 0 and O2 is low 400's...not sure if that's normal at idle. | |
|
| |
AA Administrator
Name : Aaron Age : 47 Location : C-bus, Ohio Joined : 2007-01-13 Post Count : 18452 Merit : 252
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:21 am | |
| You both have the right idea. Derek's numbers are close enough, but the .49 coefficient is incorrect
Understanding that barometer changes with the weather:
Atmospheric pressure at sea level = 101.33 kPa = 29.92 inHg = 14.70 PSI
Or:
Atmospheric pressure at 333 ft elevation = 100.00 kPa = 29.53 inHg = 14.50 PSI
Again, weather throws it off, even more so than elevation. I'm at about 875 ft elev, and have seen anywhere from 97 - 103 according to AutoTap.
To calculate boost: MAP - Barometric Pressure = Boost
So, your MAP was 130 kPa - 102 kPa Barometric Pressure = 28 kPa Boost
Converting 28 kPa to PSI = 4.06 PSI Boost
The conversion factor is .145
That's why 100 kPA = 14.5 PSI _________________ '05 GTO 6.0L • 6-spd • 95k miles • 0-60: 4.8s • 16.9 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:26'95 Celica GT 2.2L • 5-spd • 165k miles • 0-60: yes'98 SC Riviera • 281k miles • 298 HP/370 TQ • 0-60: 5.79s • ET: 13.97 @ 99.28 • 4087 lb • 20.1 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:30 3.4" pulley • AL104 plugs • 180º t-stat • FWI w/K&N • 1.9:1 rockers • OR pushrods • LS6 valve springs • SLP headers • ZZP fuel rails KYB GR2 struts • MaxAir shocks • Addco sway bars • UMI bushings • GM STB • Enkei 18" EV5s w/ Dunlop DZ101s • F-body calipers EBC bluestuff/Hawk HP plus • SS lines • Brembo slotted discs • DHP tuned • Aeroforce • Hidden Hitch^^^ SOLD ^^^ '70 Ninety-Eight Holiday Coupe 455cid • 116k miles^^^ SOLD ^^^ | |
|
| |
Bowersk Enthusiast
Name : Bowers Age : 44 Location : Okawville, Il Joined : 2011-01-19 Post Count : 219 Merit : 7
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:23 am | |
| 4.06 psi is the first number I had but I didn't think that could be right. Does that mean that there is something wrong there? I mean I know boost is going to be lower with Headers and the VS cam but I didn't think it was going to be that low. Then again, at that speed am I going to get an accurate measurement of boost psi? Ok, definitely something not right. I'm having the same problem Dreww was in this thread: https://rivperformance.editboard.com/t2083p15-faq-boost-bypass-valve-boost-control-solenoid-questions-no-boost?highlight=Low+boostLooks like the thread has been merged with some other threads but he just kinda fell off and didn't get to what the problem was. He hints at the fact that 16.4 LTFT is a vaccum leak or something. I have all new vaccum lines but maybe my vaccum routing is wrong. BBV is working fine, I can watch the rod go in and out as I rev the engine. | |
|
| |
Bowersk Enthusiast
Name : Bowers Age : 44 Location : Okawville, Il Joined : 2011-01-19 Post Count : 219 Merit : 7
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:57 am | |
| | |
|
| |
AA Administrator
Name : Aaron Age : 47 Location : C-bus, Ohio Joined : 2007-01-13 Post Count : 18452 Merit : 252
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:13 am | |
| Yeah, I'd say vac leak with +16.4 trim. Or, tune is way off. _________________ '05 GTO 6.0L • 6-spd • 95k miles • 0-60: 4.8s • 16.9 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:26'95 Celica GT 2.2L • 5-spd • 165k miles • 0-60: yes'98 SC Riviera • 281k miles • 298 HP/370 TQ • 0-60: 5.79s • ET: 13.97 @ 99.28 • 4087 lb • 20.1 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:30 3.4" pulley • AL104 plugs • 180º t-stat • FWI w/K&N • 1.9:1 rockers • OR pushrods • LS6 valve springs • SLP headers • ZZP fuel rails KYB GR2 struts • MaxAir shocks • Addco sway bars • UMI bushings • GM STB • Enkei 18" EV5s w/ Dunlop DZ101s • F-body calipers EBC bluestuff/Hawk HP plus • SS lines • Brembo slotted discs • DHP tuned • Aeroforce • Hidden Hitch^^^ SOLD ^^^ '70 Ninety-Eight Holiday Coupe 455cid • 116k miles^^^ SOLD ^^^ | |
|
| |
Bowersk Enthusiast
Name : Bowers Age : 44 Location : Okawville, Il Joined : 2011-01-19 Post Count : 219 Merit : 7
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:27 am | |
| Tune is definitely way off. I just started the tune. Still on 1.5 bin with the LQ4 Maf table only. I'm going to have to check all my vacuum lines because that is one part I had the most trouble with when I put the first motor in. There were no vacuum lines there to begin with so it was pretty much just guessing on my part.
The 16.4 LTFT is happening only at full vacuum, lowers as I lose vacuum and is going to 0 when WOT so 0 vacuum = 0 LTFT. I'm going to put a vaccum gauge on it this weekend and check my line routing. | |
|
| |
deekster_caddy Master
Name : Derek Age : 52 Location : Reading, MA Joined : 2007-01-31 Post Count : 7717 Merit : 109
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Thu Mar 08, 2012 1:30 pm | |
| Assuming you are running E10 (E7) fuel, change your stoich to 14.2. That will help reduce your LTFT a bit. Changing MAFs also requires retuning both VE and MAF. A VE tune will bring your MAF tune much closer as well.
LTFT and STFT are not used in heavy throttle.
Spray down your vacuum lines with carb cleaner (not soak, just mist) to see if you can find a leak that way. Also visually inspect all the rubber T fittings. | |
|
| |
Bowersk Enthusiast
Name : Bowers Age : 44 Location : Okawville, Il Joined : 2011-01-19 Post Count : 219 Merit : 7
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Thu Mar 08, 2012 1:57 pm | |
| - deekster_caddy wrote:
- Assuming you are running E10 (E7) fuel, change your stoich to 14.2. That will help reduce your LTFT a bit. Changing MAFs also requires retuning both VE and MAF. A VE tune will bring your MAF tune much closer as well.
LTFT and STFT are not used in heavy throttle.
Spray down your vacuum lines with carb cleaner (not soak, just mist) to see if you can find a leak that way. Also visually inspect all the rubber T fittings. On it. Yeah I'm working through Jerry's tune right now. This scan was just a baseline before I started going through it like he did. I think I found the reason for the high LTFT. Vac line to evap switch came out of the boot and was wide open. The only other thing I found that may be an issue is that the sensor on top behind the altenator (above the evap) has the vac line running to the middle port on the top of the supercharger that is normally plugged. WIth the N* I only had one port on the adapter so I had to run the line that originally went to the top port of the TB to the middle port on top of the sc...Problem is I never measured to check if vac is the same...Kinda just read it somewhere and went with it. | |
|
| |
Bowersk Enthusiast
Name : Bowers Age : 44 Location : Okawville, Il Joined : 2011-01-19 Post Count : 219 Merit : 7
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:52 pm | |
| Checked all my vacuum lines and I can find no leaks anywhere now. Carb cleaner turned up no vacuum leaks. Routing is ok and replacing the 1 port i was short on the TB with the middle port on top of the supercharger seems to be ok because they have the same vacuum measurements.
Also put the stock tune back on and just added the LQ4 table. Went out for another run and maxed out at 133 kPa with 102 Barometric....4.5 or so PSI.
At this point I can only guess that there is something wrong with the BBV or actuator or something.
The evap line issue solved the 16.4 issue it seems but LTFT is still hovering around 14 or so at idle. | |
|
| |
Bowersk Enthusiast
Name : Bowers Age : 44 Location : Okawville, Il Joined : 2011-01-19 Post Count : 219 Merit : 7
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:23 pm | |
| Figured the boost issue out, twas simply that I had a couple of vacuum lines routed wrong. Just went and did a quick run and at 86MPH WOT maxxed out at 11.4 psi, at 5461rpm...did see 3* of KR there but now i have a good place to start with my VE tune and just go step by step. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected | |
| |
|
| |
| First WOT scan on new motor...Problems Detected | |
|