Riv Performance
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

The 8th Gen Riviera Resource
 
HomeDashboardLatest imagesSearchRiviera Questions & AnswersWrite-Ups IndexRegisterRelated LinksLog in

 

 Old Cars vs. New

Go down 
+19
Sweepspear
ibmoses
deekster_caddy
robotennis61
IBx1
Boattail Bill
BMD
Shintsu
jimmyriv
SpaceBar
97rivman
1998 Riv
T Riley
Jack the R
racinfan
NO 4 EVR
jax95riv
AA
Andysdorm
23 posters
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
AuthorMessage
1998 Riv
Expert
1998 Riv


Name : Dave
Age : 64
Location : In The AZ Oven
Joined : 2007-01-17
Post Count : 4502
Merit : 44

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 12:01 am

This is part of what I love about my old Buick(just installed):
Beats the heck out of the Grant wheel I removed...

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Newwheel001
Back to top Go down
1998 Riv
Expert
1998 Riv


Name : Dave
Age : 64
Location : In The AZ Oven
Joined : 2007-01-17
Post Count : 4502
Merit : 44

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 12:01 am

But I guess it's really not safe, since there's no airbag in it. smile
Back to top Go down
AA
Administrator
AA


Name : Aaron
Age : 47
Location : C-bus, Ohio
Joined : 2007-01-13
Post Count : 18452
Merit : 252

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 12:04 am

I know what you mean, Dave. My Olds wheel looks a little like your Buick's, but I know the Riviera has the "better" one. wink

_________________
'05 GTO 6.0L • 6-spd • 95k miles • 0-60: 4.8s • 16.9 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:26

'95 Celica GT 2.2L • 5-spd • 165k miles • 0-60: yes

'98 SC Riviera • 281k miles • 298 HP/370 TQ • 0-60: 5.79s • ET: 13.97 @ 99.28 • 4087 lb • 20.1 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:30
3.4" pulley • AL104 plugs • 180º t-stat • FWI w/K&N • 1.9:1 rockers • OR pushrods • LS6 valve springs • SLP headers • ZZP fuel rails
KYB GR2 struts • MaxAir shocks • Addco sway bars • UMI bushings • GM STB • Enkei 18" EV5s w/ Dunlop DZ101s • F-body calipers
EBC bluestuff/Hawk HP plus • SS lines • Brembo slotted discs • DHP tuned • Aeroforce • Hidden Hitch

^^^ SOLD ^^^ frown

'70 Ninety-Eight Holiday Coupe 455cid • 116k miles
^^^ SOLD ^^^ frown
Back to top Go down
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/657082/4
1998 Riv
Expert
1998 Riv


Name : Dave
Age : 64
Location : In The AZ Oven
Joined : 2007-01-17
Post Count : 4502
Merit : 44

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 1:12 am

I'd guess your Olds and the 69 and up Buicks used the same sport(rallye) steering wheel. 68 is the only year that Buick offered this simulated wood wheel, it's larger in diameter, has a deeper dish, and is actually the same wheel that you could get in many GM models in 67 and 68, including the 'vettes. I could buy a nice used one with really no defects, for around $650... afraid I picked this one up for $100. It's got 4 cracks, as you can see, but it works for me. A good restoration costs more than buying a real nice used wheel, believe it or not.
Back to top Go down
AA
Administrator
AA


Name : Aaron
Age : 47
Location : C-bus, Ohio
Joined : 2007-01-13
Post Count : 18452
Merit : 252

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 2:06 am

Mine's a little more formal, but similar thickness. It's the original wheel as far as I know:

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 6630780024_large

_________________
'05 GTO 6.0L • 6-spd • 95k miles • 0-60: 4.8s • 16.9 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:26

'95 Celica GT 2.2L • 5-spd • 165k miles • 0-60: yes

'98 SC Riviera • 281k miles • 298 HP/370 TQ • 0-60: 5.79s • ET: 13.97 @ 99.28 • 4087 lb • 20.1 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:30
3.4" pulley • AL104 plugs • 180º t-stat • FWI w/K&N • 1.9:1 rockers • OR pushrods • LS6 valve springs • SLP headers • ZZP fuel rails
KYB GR2 struts • MaxAir shocks • Addco sway bars • UMI bushings • GM STB • Enkei 18" EV5s w/ Dunlop DZ101s • F-body calipers
EBC bluestuff/Hawk HP plus • SS lines • Brembo slotted discs • DHP tuned • Aeroforce • Hidden Hitch

^^^ SOLD ^^^ frown

'70 Ninety-Eight Holiday Coupe 455cid • 116k miles
^^^ SOLD ^^^ frown
Back to top Go down
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/657082/4
robotennis61
Guru
robotennis61


Name : robotennis
Age : 63
Location : las vegas
Joined : 2007-12-17
Post Count : 5562
Merit : 143

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 2:10 am

i would love to own a old car. f..k FI ,im sure with the right carb combo i could get decent mileage...
Back to top Go down
Jack the R
Master
Jack the R


Joined : 2007-01-16
Post Count : 8074
Merit : 105

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 2:23 am

AA wrote:
Jack, I'd be careful using the word "can't" -

Well if you want to build a tube frame car and bolt the body panels of a Riv on it, anything's possible.
Back to top Go down
Jack the R
Master
Jack the R


Joined : 2007-01-16
Post Count : 8074
Merit : 105

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 8:07 pm

AA wrote:
When you modify an older vehicle, you usually do it with newer parts having better tolerances.

I've been thinking about this and I believe it's only true in the sense that there are more 2009 parts on the shelves in 2009 than there are 1969 parts on the shelves.

It's also true that there are guys who can afford to build a brand new 2009 "69" Camaro or Mustang from year one, with modern engines, brakes, and suspensions, but those aren't the usual guys building muscle cars.

I'd say the "usual" muscle car guy is going to be building with parts that are little to no better than parts available in the 60's. Or even the same parts. They could get aluminum cylinder heads from Edelbrock that have benefitted from computer modelling of the air flow. But those are expensive. More likely they'll go for a port and polish of the stock heads. They could convert to FI, but more likely they'll go for a bigger carb that is not significantly more advanced than a 60's carb. Summit even sells refurbished original Q-jets.

If you took a poll of muscle car owners on this site, I suspect you'll find not many are using parts that are more high tech than the ones from back in the day. They're doing the same basic hot rodding tricks from 40 years ago, not applying new technology.

robotennis61 wrote:
i would love to own a old car. f..k FI ,im sure with the right carb combo i could get decent mileage...

No matter how well you get your carbuerated engine tuned, I think the aerodynamics of the old cars are going to be impossible to get around. The 3 speed transmission won't help either, if that's what you end up with.

I researched converting to FI a year ago, and a lot of people thought FI was not more efficient than a well tuned carb. You've got to find a guy who can teach you how to tune a carb though, and carb guys are getting scarce. You have to tune for the day's weather, which can mean tuning very frequently if you want top performance. Some carbs can be ruined if the engine backfires. All in all they were phased out for good reason.
Back to top Go down
deekster_caddy
Master



Name : Derek
Age : 52
Location : Reading, MA
Joined : 2007-01-31
Post Count : 7717
Merit : 109

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 8:25 pm

Jack the R wrote:
I researched converting to FI a year ago, and a lot of people thought FI was not more efficient than a well tuned carb. You've got to find a guy who can teach you how to tune a carb though, and carb guys are getting scarce. You have to tune for the day's weather, which can mean tuning very frequently if you want top performance. Some carbs can be ruined if the engine backfires. All in all they were phased out for good reason.

We can do much, much more with the FI 455 than we could with a carb. You can take a big, lumpy cam and bring it down to a smooth idle. With computer controlled timing, we can do so much more tuning because we can make timing adjustments without dealing with mechanical or vacuum variables. It's all computer controlled...

It was expensive. We had to buy the speed pro (FAST) engine management controller. We had a custom plumbed intake manifold for the injectors - it could have been done with a throttle body injected unit, but they aren't as good as a dry throttle body, plus we'd need much bigger injectors which don't idle as well. We had to tune it ourselves, at the time nobody else knew how and we only had a 'chevy 350' tune to start with. We had a ton of wiring to do, to get the injectors and fuel pump wired up properly. We eat fuel pumps like there's no tomorrow, running a high pressure _external_ fuel pump sucks. We are looking at an in-tank conversion because the heat is just killing the pumps over and over again. We actually have 3 fuel pumps in the car, plus a sump in the rear of the tank where 2 of them draw fuel from...

But we still believe it was all worth it to this day.

The car is 40 years old. It clearly has issues a 40 year old car has. The front suspension needs work and some parts that are not available anymore. It gets quite.. umm squirrely I guess you would call it. But we are probably going to migrate the drivetrain over to my LeSabre, so we can enjoy that car more!
Back to top Go down
Jack the R
Master
Jack the R


Joined : 2007-01-16
Post Count : 8074
Merit : 105

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 9:02 pm

I'm not experienced enough with carbs to argue with you. How much did converting to FI cost you? The kits I see are in the $3-4000 area. Enough to buy a built 3.8 and IC, maybe get it installed.
Back to top Go down
BMD
Aficionado
BMD


Name : BMD
Location : Canada
Joined : 2009-04-28
Post Count : 1161
Merit : 36

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 9:11 pm

I'm not saying that I wish technology never advanced and that we were all still adjusting carbs according to the forecast, like Jack eludes to above. But that in and of itself was what owning a car meant back then. Getting under the hood aquiring a better understanding of what makes your car drive better. In some cases it was a requirement. I know some people today who don't even know how to open their hood. The owner is being removed from the ownership experience. The cars today can park themselves and pretty soon drive themselves, why don't we all just fast forward to the day when we can all say " Beam me up Scottie"!


Last edited by BMD on Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:16 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
deekster_caddy
Master



Name : Derek
Age : 52
Location : Reading, MA
Joined : 2007-01-31
Post Count : 7717
Merit : 109

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 9:36 pm

Jack the R wrote:
I'm not experienced enough with carbs to argue with you. How much did converting to FI cost you? The kits I see are in the $3-4000 area. Enough to buy a built 3.8 and IC, maybe get it installed.

It was about $4000. Keep in mind this was more than 10 years ago too.
Back to top Go down
Jack the R
Master
Jack the R


Joined : 2007-01-16
Post Count : 8074
Merit : 105

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat Sep 05, 2009 11:41 pm

$4000 sounds right.

I wonder if I could get an entire 3rd Gen Hemi drivetrain for that much?
Back to top Go down
Rickw
Guru



Name : Rick
Location : Lancaster, MA
Joined : 2008-09-13
Post Count : 6282
Merit : 119

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySun Sep 06, 2009 7:42 am

JR,
I think YearOne is doing complete engines now, including Hemi's, with a decent warranty.
Back to top Go down
Jack the R
Master
Jack the R


Joined : 2007-01-16
Post Count : 8074
Merit : 105

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySun Sep 06, 2009 9:31 am

Yeah, $15-20k for the engine alone. Worth it if you've got the money, but I don't have that kind of money. I spotted a 3rd gen hemi w/transmission on Ebay for $2500. 60,000 miles on it but that ain't too bad.
Back to top Go down
ibmoses
Aficionado
ibmoses


Name : Bert
Location : North Alabama
Joined : 2008-02-03
Post Count : 1701
Merit : 32

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySun Sep 06, 2009 3:06 pm

I agree with Dave about the steering wheel being one of my favorite things about my old car. clap
This one was only available on a Buick and only during 1969 and 1970.
Its a 16" wheel and has a "thumb groove". (Daves wheel appears to be 16" also)

Lots of them were ruined by people using them to hang onto while climbing in and out of the car or in the case of the straight shift cars people would jerk on them when they were banging gears and bend them.
Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Picture_1281
Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Picture_1280

Bert tavis
Back to top Go down
Jack the R
Master
Jack the R


Joined : 2007-01-16
Post Count : 8074
Merit : 105

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySun Sep 06, 2009 5:50 pm

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Beineke_71_mopar_super_bird_03_

Mopar "Tuff" steering wheel. With it's small diameter and thick grip, it's considered by Mopar fans to be one of the best factory steering wheels (of the muscle car era, I assume). This is not the wheel I have. Mine is huge and skinny like ya'lls.
Back to top Go down
1998 Riv
Expert
1998 Riv


Name : Dave
Age : 64
Location : In The AZ Oven
Joined : 2007-01-17
Post Count : 4502
Merit : 44

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptyMon Sep 07, 2009 12:41 am

ibmoses wrote:


This one was only available on a Buick and only during 1969 and 1970.
Its a 16" wheel and has a "thumb groove". (Daves wheel appears to be 16" also)....


Yep, the 68's were 16", but were thinner. It's a VERY different feel than the Grant wheel, which was much like Jack's Mopar pic, but w/o that center cap (ugh, IMHO)
Back to top Go down
Jack the R
Master
Jack the R


Joined : 2007-01-16
Post Count : 8074
Merit : 105

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptyMon Sep 07, 2009 12:48 am

The Tuff center cap ain't pretty but which one would you rather crack your head against?
Back to top Go down
AA
Administrator
AA


Name : Aaron
Age : 47
Location : C-bus, Ohio
Joined : 2007-01-13
Post Count : 18452
Merit : 252

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptyMon Sep 07, 2009 4:38 am

Imo, Riviera's airbag-equipped is the best. wink

_________________
'05 GTO 6.0L • 6-spd • 95k miles • 0-60: 4.8s • 16.9 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:26

'95 Celica GT 2.2L • 5-spd • 165k miles • 0-60: yes

'98 SC Riviera • 281k miles • 298 HP/370 TQ • 0-60: 5.79s • ET: 13.97 @ 99.28 • 4087 lb • 20.1 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:30
3.4" pulley • AL104 plugs • 180º t-stat • FWI w/K&N • 1.9:1 rockers • OR pushrods • LS6 valve springs • SLP headers • ZZP fuel rails
KYB GR2 struts • MaxAir shocks • Addco sway bars • UMI bushings • GM STB • Enkei 18" EV5s w/ Dunlop DZ101s • F-body calipers
EBC bluestuff/Hawk HP plus • SS lines • Brembo slotted discs • DHP tuned • Aeroforce • Hidden Hitch

^^^ SOLD ^^^ frown

'70 Ninety-Eight Holiday Coupe 455cid • 116k miles
^^^ SOLD ^^^ frown
Back to top Go down
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/657082/4
ibmoses
Aficionado
ibmoses


Name : Bert
Location : North Alabama
Joined : 2008-02-03
Post Count : 1701
Merit : 32

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptyMon Sep 07, 2009 8:40 am

AA wrote:
Imo, Riviera's airbag-equipped is the best. wink

agree When they first started putting the controls on steering wheels I recall thinking that was an absurd idea, that it was ridiculous. That was just one of the many changes that were made that I never saw coming. Those steering wheel controls may have saved some lives by preventing drivers from being distracted while fiddling with the radio.

Bert tavis
Back to top Go down
1998 Riv
Expert
1998 Riv


Name : Dave
Age : 64
Location : In The AZ Oven
Joined : 2007-01-17
Post Count : 4502
Merit : 44

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptyMon Sep 07, 2009 11:43 am

Jack the R wrote:
The Tuff center cap ain't pretty but which one would you rather crack your head against?


Well duh, neither...
Back to top Go down
AA
Administrator
AA


Name : Aaron
Age : 47
Location : C-bus, Ohio
Joined : 2007-01-13
Post Count : 18452
Merit : 252

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptyWed Jan 18, 2012 11:52 am

Car owners are keeping vehicles longer - new buying trend predicted:

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Polk-avaerage-car-age

Link: https://www.polk.com/company/news/average_age_of_vehicles_reaches_record_high_according_to_polk

_________________
'05 GTO 6.0L • 6-spd • 95k miles • 0-60: 4.8s • 16.9 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:26

'95 Celica GT 2.2L • 5-spd • 165k miles • 0-60: yes

'98 SC Riviera • 281k miles • 298 HP/370 TQ • 0-60: 5.79s • ET: 13.97 @ 99.28 • 4087 lb • 20.1 avg MPG • Nelson Ledges Lap: 1:30
3.4" pulley • AL104 plugs • 180º t-stat • FWI w/K&N • 1.9:1 rockers • OR pushrods • LS6 valve springs • SLP headers • ZZP fuel rails
KYB GR2 struts • MaxAir shocks • Addco sway bars • UMI bushings • GM STB • Enkei 18" EV5s w/ Dunlop DZ101s • F-body calipers
EBC bluestuff/Hawk HP plus • SS lines • Brembo slotted discs • DHP tuned • Aeroforce • Hidden Hitch

^^^ SOLD ^^^ frown

'70 Ninety-Eight Holiday Coupe 455cid • 116k miles
^^^ SOLD ^^^ frown
Back to top Go down
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/657082/4
abaucom
Enthusiast



Name : Al Baucom
Location : Ottawa Ontario
Joined : 2010-03-28
Post Count : 225
Merit : 22

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySat May 12, 2012 8:32 pm

Had some time today and found this old thread started 2007. Very quickly a thread regarding buying an older, perhaps classic auto, turned from 1st pictures of a 1966 T-Bird and a 1963 T-Bird into a tread having no relation to the original post... That first post is what caught my attention.
Personal as I helped my parents pick out a new 1963 T-Bird, became my first car at age 16, early 1967. Then in late 1965, Dad went to buy a 1966 Mustang, but I talked him into buying a 1966 T-Bird Town Landau that became my second car in 1969.

Then very fast the thread turned into a thread about HP and reliability and pages of posts that had nothing to offer regarding the original post. Post after post did not relate to the original post. I am happy so many young people like their Rivera’s but disappointed some of these new car guys have no concept of auto history or respect for why some cars are considered “Classics”.

No one said that old cars handle better than today’s cars or that they didn't have mechanical issues. But when you worked on them you didn't hook up a PC to tune it. Now, in 2012, parts for my 14 year old Riviera are hard to get, my GM dealership is hard pressed to find a mechanic that can work on a 14-15 year old Riviera. Last year my GM dealership had to fly in an old guy mechanic from Toronto to Ottawa to fix stuff on my 1998 Riv.

Buying a 50s-70s auto is not about HP, not about gas mileage, not about build quality. It is about a personal passion for an auto style and what that auto represents to an individual.

My 1998 Riv. is still less than 70,000 miles. Do I want my Riviera to be as fast as my 2011 Camaro? No. Will I ever modify my Riv. to go faster of sound louder, No. But I do enjoy reading threads on this site for those that put in much effort to make their cars go faster.

The last gen Riviera was one of the last two door full size luxury American autos. I appreciate it for what it is, an American full size luxury two door coupe with unique styling. My Riv. was never designed to be a muscle car.

Fact is our last gen. Rivera’s does not have current collector value. I follow collector car values. Not in my remaining lifetime will our last generation Riv. be a collectable (next ten years – I am an old fart in my early 60s). However, I predict a 25 year old last gen. Riv, numbers matching factory stock model will be pushing $30,000 for a low mileage example by 2023. Fact: you could buy a 1963 T-Bird convertible in 1988 for about $3,000, rust free. 2012, try to buy a rusted 1963 T-Bird convertible for under $15,000 that could be restored for more than $20,000 - 40,000 shop cost (best example 1963 T-Bird convertible Roadster sold for $125,000 3 years ago).

Enjoy doing mods. Fact is, if you want to get best bucks for you Riv. in the future, keep it factory stock. Because today, and tomorrow, no one is going to pay for your modifications. We put money into our Rivera’s because we love the car. Nothing more. Darn, I already spent more than $5,000 on my 1998 Riviera than I ever expect back if it was sold.

Regarding the OP from 2007. Five years later, even 1966 and 1963 T-Bird hardtops have gone up 7-15 thousand dollars for a rust free example needing restoration. Hard to find a restorable convertible for under $25,000 and restoration will cost an additional $20,000-30,000. Believe me because I have been in the market to buy a 1963 or 1966 T-Bird for at least five years.

I enjoy reading threads on this site regarding how younger Riv. owners mod. their rides. At the same time, respect that there are older Riv. owners that read this site, seldom feel a need to post, that want to maintain their Rivera’s, keep them factory stock.

Please do not respond unless you read all 7-pages of this thread going back to 2007. Hate it when people respond to a thread and only look at the last few responses and not take the time to read the entire thread.

PS: reading 7 pages of posts back to 2007, most Reponses thought OP choices of a 1966 or 1963 T-Bird silly. If OP had bought a 1963 or 1966 T-Bird hardtop back in 2007, did not restore it, in 2012 OP would have made about $800 per year profit just to put the Bird in a garage. Doubt if your 401K or other investments did as well in the last five years.

Back to top Go down
deekster_caddy
Master



Name : Derek
Age : 52
Location : Reading, MA
Joined : 2007-01-31
Post Count : 7717
Merit : 109

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 EmptySun May 13, 2012 10:50 am

Al,

Thanks for reviving this thread! I reread the whole thing just to see what transpired. The most negative voice throughout the thread is no longer with our group. He officially 'trolled' us… He was very good at that.

I respectfully disagree about the rest of the thread not being related to the OP. The OP was about buying a '60s era car and daily driving it. What kinds of things would be involved in turning a 40 year old car into a reliable daily driver. Most of the followup discussion IS relative, discussing old cars, using modern technology in old cars, comparing older safety standards to modern safety standards, etc. Even though the discussion strays from the originally T-bird thoughts, it is certainly relative (we are not, after all, a T-bird forum!)

I definitely agree with you about the late gen Riv not being 'Collectible' in the collector car sense of the term. It is difficult to find a modern car that fits the collectible model. However, it is still a very nice car and a solid platform that has proven over the last 14 years to have some holding power. That said, there are a lot of modern cars where they have figured how to increase the longevity of parts to extremes. Other places where manufacturers take precautions NOT to have cars last forever (ungreaseable ball joints?!!?)

In the last year I have nearly completed reviving my '73 LeSabre. It is registered and driving again, with a 455 under the hood. I just went to work on the brake master cylinder and booster, and sure enough broke off the brake lines as described in one of the middle posts. All the brake lines are indeed rusty. I was lucky enough to be able to locate a shop that makes these:

Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Kt

so I can avoid the fate of the mid-80s cutlass mentioned earlier. Not that I would discard my car over a few hand-bent brake lines, but this was a job I was NOT looking forward to. Now it will be much easier. This job is all too common in 40+ year old cars, and again most certainly a factor in deciding to DD a 60's era car. Stuff is old. Worn out. Who knows when you may need to stab the brakes and suddenly a ball joint brakes off… or a spring snaps… or who knows what?

I also don't expect anyone else to work on this car. I wouldn't expect anyone to want to. There may come a time when I need to let someone else work on it (alignment?) and I am sure I will be hovering over it the entire time. It is not a collectors item. I am repairing body panels as needed to make it solid and safe, not a show or collector piece.

So my '73 will be driven and enjoyed, but not relied on as a DD. I will certainly drive it to work occasionally and use it often, but will not have to rely on it as such (even though it is a VERY reliable drivetrain). I do not expect it to collect value. I realize the car is worthless to anyone except me, so I feel comfortable knowing that any money I do put into it I will never get back.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Old Cars vs. New   Old Cars vs. New - Page 4 Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Old Cars vs. New
Back to top 
Page 4 of 5Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 Similar topics
-
» The Other Showroom: Current / Past Rides (Pt I)
» will this fit our cars
» Write-Up: Low Beams + Brights On at Same Time
» What other cars have our steering?
» 97rivman's Cars

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Riv Performance ::   General Tech :: Care & Maintenance-
Jump to: